Simulation and uncertainty at Caterpillar

Image: Slide 23 Graphic.jpg

Combining test data with a greater number of simulation runs extends the performance data set of a design, elevating the question beyond simply correlating test data perfectly with a particular test run or test average. (Caterpillar)

Caterpillar delivers a product line that might be the most diverse in the world. Its equipment ranges from simple, small 13-hp (9.7-kW) excavators to machines that require over 20 railroad cars to deliver, according to Randall Huber, Advanced Virtual Product Development Manager at Caterpillar. The same equipment may need to work high at thousands of feet of elevation to far below sea level, in the arctic or desert. In addition to those challenges are increasing regulation, a dynamic market, and fierce competition.

These challenges are driving a push to the virtual, guided by Huber. “We define virtual product development, or VPD, as physics-based simulation,” stressed Huber. While useful in validation, Caterpillar is now using VPD to develop early concepts and influence design before it becomes fixed for manufacturing. “It is all about driving early discovery in the development process,” he said. While accounting for the typical functions a virtual world can simulate, Caterpillar’s VPD is unique in that it starts with work site productivity. Some of this is done using proprietary software Caterpillar created. Durability, reliability, performance, quality, and efficiency are all qualities defined through using virtual tools. From manufacturing of components to work site deployment, Caterpillar desires to simulate it all.

The ultimate goal—seamless simulation

Like other organizations, Caterpillar is continuously investing in its VPD. It is in the process of creating higher levels of capability through improving both product data management and better physical models. At its simplest, its CAE simulation provides directional guidance, confirming that, for example, Design A is better than Design B without being able to quantify exactly how much or attempting to correlate simulated results with test data. The next level is producing answers that are quantitatively correct—correlated with test data. The next level of capability is to do this rapidly, through standard work procedures and shared models. “Once we can do it fast, then we can explore designs quickly, creating robust designs that will work well and are consistently manufacturable,” he said.

The computing and data management infrastructure for this ultimate, seamless VPD requires plenty of computing horsepower, which is becoming faster and cheaper. It also requires accurate loads prediction—model inputs that accurately capture what the customer will do with the machine based on practical product application knowledge.

Finally, it requires quantifying uncertainty. “We have got to get away from discreet event modeling,” he explained. “The world is way too complex. As we do model simulation, we cannot look at it just as a discrete event.”

Fundamentals and uncertainty

While correlation from model to physical test is vital, it has its problems. How many tests accurately predict the behavior limits of a machine in operation? If a simulation model uses only nominal dimensions and loads, what variations on those will capture real-world performance?

“For example, if we run a real bulldozer over a ditch four times to calculate an average life, and turn that data over to a simulation expert, our analysts have determined it is impossible to expect a single simulation to match the average at all locations simultaneously,” he explained. How does a design engineer interpret such a result? Is it wrong, or was the test data not representative?

To make CAE simulation more useful, Huber and his team turned the tables on the problem. Instead of assuming that the simulation was either correct or incorrect, they ran a series of simulations at varying conditions similar to the test and then compared the resulting distribution to determine if these are statistically from the same data set. In effect, they treat the simulation as if it was run number 5 through 25 of the physical test in his bulldozer example. “When you do that, all of a sudden you get a different thought process on correlation,” he said. Now simulation is used to determine sensitivity to inputs, and as long as the test data and simulation data are determined to be from the same population, they become an integrated set of data. “You can now run a thousand point DoE where you cannot tell which is simulated and which is test,” he said. The next step in their development is to do much of that DoE work up front in simulation, prior to physical testing.

“So as we look at it, our simulation's equations are a function of credible physics and technical competence,” he explained. “But [also] a combination of reasonably correct physics combined with really good statistics.”

Share
HTML for Linking to Page
Page URL
Grade
Rate It
4.09 Avg. Rating

Read More Articles On

2013-11-22
Now that simulation and modeling are common techniques for designing equipment, standards groups are stepping in to add a bit more structure and compatibility for these tools. Two trade associations have paired up to establish a working group that aims to make it simpler to merge engineering analysis with overall systems behavior analysis.
2013-10-30
In an attempt to achieve a balance between Reynolds number, model scale, and tunnel blockage issues, a 1:3 scale heavy-vehicle testing program has been initiated at the Monash University 1.4-MW wind tunnel.
2014-01-15
Acoustic performance has become a key competitive factor for off-highway equipment due to an increasing focus on operator comfort and noise pollution as well as continuing regulatory pressure.
2014-04-04
According to CD-adapco's Frederick Ross, the first, and most difficult, stage in the construction of a virtual prototype is the process of pulling together all of the individual CAD parts that define a vehicle.

Related Items

Article
2014-04-07
Training / Education
2011-04-12
Book
2002-04-15
Article
2014-04-07
Standard
1987-05-01
Standard
2002-10-30
Standard
2013-05-03